Bioplast

«« Best jewelry for a permanent corset? Shiny new jewelry »»

Wednesday March 19th, 2008 @ 1:30 AM

Filed under: Uncategorized

Warren-

In one of your comments on a recent modblog post:

“. . .or if they are the BioPlast that is immensely rampant within the piercing community because they don’t know any better.”

Explain? I have heard nothing but good things about Bioplast so I would love to hear what you have to say.

Pull up a spot on the rug as grandpa is gonna toke on his pipe by the fireplace in his rocker and tell a story….Ok so I ain’t nobodies Grandpa and I don’t like rocking chairs and I of course don’t smoke…But I do have a lil story to tell.

A few years ago shortly after I finished my first apprenticeship my tattoo artist and I were working towards opening up our own studio. A friend of ours had a giant two level store front and they were willing to co-own it with us and help us get it all started,etc. So in my attempt to get the piercing side sorted out, I contacted VARIOUS jewelry companies for catalogs,etc. A few companies catalogs had something called “BioPlast”…When discussing it with them they talked about how great it was, that its cheap, it can be cut to size,etc. When I asked them for any confirmation in Implant Grade Specifications or Bio-Compatibility Specifications, they were unable to provide me any. Because of this I simply decided I would not want to carry said material because if it can’t be confirmed as Implant Grade or Bio-Compatible by ISO or ASTM standards, then it should not be used for piercings.

Fast forward to today, I’m a bit older and a bit more wiser and have done more serious research into the subject. But first lets separate the misconceptions that various people have involving plastic/flexible/bendy based materials:

PTFE aka Polytetrafluoroethylene aka Teflon: This is often used in the Piercing industry and not going into the environmental damage PTFE does to the environment simply put, ptfe has a implant grade specification number: ASTM F754-00. This means if a Body Piercer is going to use PTFE, this is the specific type of PTFE they are to be using…And it should be used in a manner, that does not compromise the ASTM F754-00 standard that is given to it.

Tygon aka Silicone Tubing: Tygon is a specific trademark named product, much like Teflon is a trademarked name of PTFE. There’s various types of Silicone Tubing some might be bio-compatible while others won’t, especially in a fresh piercing. For Tygon personally I think the ideal tubing type to be used is: TYGON® S-50-HL Medical/Surgical Tubing as its fully characterized to ISO 10993 and FDA guidelines for biocompatibility. There are a couple other Tygon brands that meet the same ISO guidelines,etc, but again there’s also a few Tygon bands that DON’T meet said ISO guidelines.

This brings us to the glorious world of BioPlast.

BioPlast aka Udel Polysulfone: Their website states the following: “Bioplast” Corresponding to the current state of knowledge it represents a material, which is safe for the production of piercing jewellery as far as biocompatibility is concerned (Ref.: Technical Bulletin biocompatibility of Polysulfones for Medical Devices MD 50136 R12/99). Now in my research I have been unable to locate any confirmed documentation, just speculation. Also last to my recollection any discussion in the medical world on Bio-Compatibility,etc will not be touching on the subject of piercing jewelry and the safety measures surrounding it.

In my own independent research of Udel Polysulfones I have found there to be a large variety of usages for said material: plumbing, medical world,etc. However when it comes to the medical world we need to observe exactly how Udel Polysulfones are being used. The following website lists Udel Polysulfones being used for: surgical trays, nebulizers, humidifiers; note nothing is listed in regards to Udel Polysulfone being internally inserted into the body (ie: a body piercing). Also when researching through the ASTM and ISO standards for Implant or Bio-Compatible capabilities, you will not find Udel Polysulfones listed at all.

Yes Bioplast is resistant to heat and steam, thus meaning it can be sterilized. But just because something can be sterilized, does not always mean it should be inserted into the body in respect to a body piercing, especially in a fresh piercing. Also and finally another lil thing is that the majority of BioPlast sold is for the Externally Threaded body jewelry line, as most piercers tend to just want to cram the beads onto the BioPlast piece. This of course makes it an externally threaded piece of jewelry and because its crudely threaded on, makes the threading on the post a bit rough. They do make special tools to create the external threading and even internal, but I’ve yet to see or hear of a piercer using them. Also as for their Internal/Push-In style of jewelry, I know I personally often have people coming in looking for new beads as their beads simply fell out.

Now I’m not going to say it can’t be used, as I believe it can. But I personally believe the avenue in which it can be used for, is more for troubleshooting problematic piercings. So by saying that I personally believe it should be a last resort attempt to salvage a piercing and troubleshoot the situation to correct it, not to be used for initial fresh piercings.

Posted by Warren Hiller | Permalink | Leave a comment | Trackback

15 Responses to “Bioplast”

I agree completely with using Bio-Plast for problematic piercings. I got my Monroe pierced about a year ago, first with a typical, metal labret stud. I was having a problem with the metal disc getting caught on my gums when I smiled and when I was doing “other things.” So I ordered an internally threaded Bio-Plast labret stud and I have had no problems since then.

mary k on March 19th, 2008 at 12:16 pm

Interesting story about bioplast…I tried it in my tongue piercing once…bear in mind this was a piercing I’d had for almost 4 years at the time, and I had used various types of metal in it (stainless steel, titanium etc) without any sort of problems. After about a week with the bioplast barbell my piercing was SO irritated. The tissue around the hole was discolored and it was seriously painful. Luckily, just taking it out and putting steel back in brought it back to normal in a couple days. All in all, bioplast gets a BIG thumbs down from me.

jack on March 19th, 2008 at 1:58 pm

If anyone wants to look it up in PubMed, there’s actually a fair number of papers about using polysulfone in implants. I don’t know if these are the same type(s) of polysulfone sold under the TRADE NAME Bioplast, however, because bioplast is apparently also a generic name for a synthetic actin polymer, which is definitely not what you would want to make jewellery out of, so it’s hard to filter through the search results.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?term=polysulfone%20implant

Xenobiologista on March 19th, 2008 at 10:06 pm

I wish I had known this about 3 days ago… I’d heard so much about the wonders of BioPlast, and had it put into a VERY fresh piercing…I had a very bad reaction and don’t have the piercing anymore.

S on March 20th, 2008 at 10:45 pm

Xenobiologista: That’s very true I have found many papers and what not but as always that’s research papers. So as I stated its purely speculation until proper standardized testing is completed in such area’s as ASTM as well as ISO for any implant and/or bio-compatible capabilities.

Most papers discuss bio-compatibility and not implant capability, at least in the searches I’ve found…Although the papers I’ve read discuss that due to the bio-compatibility that research into implant capability should be done,etc…

But as my view is always this, I will continue to champion it…Is the material being put into the piercing implant grade material, or is it not? Implant Grade thus meeting the ASTM standards for medical implant devices/materials,etc.

Warren Hiller on March 22nd, 2008 at 12:47 am

I have had a similar reaction to what Jack describes. I work midnight shift at a casino four days a week and I am required not to have any piercings at all. I decided to try to hide it by using the bioplast lebre. It worked for a couple of days, then it starts itching and hurts really bad. The piercing itself didn’t hurt that bad when I got it. Whe I put the surgical steel back in, it stings for a little bit, but in a few days it goes back to normal. I have tried looking for glass lebre rings since then, but there’s not too many out there. Anybody have a suggestion?

Kaechelle on September 20th, 2008 at 9:41 pm

I struggled with severe hypertrophic scarring on my nostril piercing for almost 2 years before finally buying a bioplast nose screw as a last resort–it was that, or I’d finally have to accept that my nose would never heal. After about 2 months my bump was almost completely down with just a minor dot of scarring, and now, 6 months later, there isn’t a single trace of a scar left. After 2 problematic helix piercings and one of my two nipple piercings needing longer-than-normal healing time, I am very hesitant to get my navel pierced for fear an already very tricky piercing will be devestating. I was considering getting it done with a bioplast piece, but I wanted to look into it first. Because I have a good history with bioplast and a slightly poorer one with stainless, wouldn’t it be better than to skip the likely stainless steel nightmare and go straight for the material that worked best before?

Sekhmet on October 7th, 2008 at 10:54 am

Sekhmet: there would be a lot of questions to factor in on this subject matter.

1) what aftercare protocols you used.
2) What type of stainless steel you had inserted
3) How it was pierced(technique,tools/equipment,etc)

You could always try to research and make sure the jewelry being used is internally threaded ASTM compliant implant grade 316LVM stainless steel or ASTM compliant implant grade titanium.

Or you might even be a person that’s ok to have bioplast…but again there’s no implant grade standards for it so its very much a craps shoot and as a professional I do not feel comfortable suggesting clients use it on a fresh piercing…better to be safe than sorry I say.

Warren Hiller on October 7th, 2008 at 5:42 pm

Ive had my navel pierced for about 2 weeks now, and ive had it done twice before and ive always have had issues with the 316 surgical steel grade jewelry ive had put in it, idk if im having an allergic reaction to it or if my body doesnt like it, anywho i was wondering if it was too soon to switch to a bioplast navel ring, or if i should just not put one in at all..

Raven on December 31st, 2008 at 2:03 am

Raven: Stay away from 316 Surgical Stainless Steel, its crap.

ALWAYS demand/ask for ASTM F-138 316LVM Stainless Steel.

Doctors don’t leave surgical scissors and other surgical tools in the body, so why leave “surgical” jewelry in?

If the jewelry is of proper implant grade specifications and you’re anatomy is suited for a navel piercing AND if it was done by a competent piercer…You should be fine and not require changing any jewelry at all, unless you decide you want a different gem or something like that.

2 weeks IS too soon to change a piercing jewelry, especially to something that doesn’t even have any proper studies on it and is used for products that are not put inside the body…Such as bioplast is.

Warren Hiller on December 31st, 2008 at 12:24 pm

Ok, so I am wanting to get my lip pierced, but am in the midst of hunting for a job. If I get a job that doesn’t allow piercings, I would have to put a clear retainer in. I have had my nose pierced fo about 9 months now and sometimes I put a clear bioplast retainer in it. I haven’t had any problems with it at all. Would it be okay to initially get my lip pierced with a bioplast retainer?

Rave1 on February 9th, 2009 at 5:11 pm

Rave1: You didn’t bother reading what was written did you? That or perhaps you didn’t comprehend what I wrote?

No technically Bioplast is NOT suitable for an initial piercing.

you can either:

A) Put your job before your piercings and simply wait to get pierced until you’re able to wear a steel or titanium piece

B) Get your piercer to use a Quartz Retainer initially.

Warren Hiller on February 14th, 2009 at 7:26 am

I got my labret pierced over a year and a half ago . . . even though, as a professional dog handler, I knew it was a stupid move to put a metal stud *rightnext* to my teeth. I love my piercing, and have since the moment I got it; so of course the first time a dog slammed into my face (about two months after the piercing) and chipped a tooth, I was heartbroken thinking I’d have to take the stud out.

Found about about the Bioplast line and figured I’d give it a try. My piercing *was* fully healed (almost immediately, actually), which is probably why I didn’t have issues. Now when dogs slam into my face, the only pain is from the impact.(Something to be grateful for, hunh?) I’m *so* glad that I found these thingies. I’ve had the same stud in the whole time, and have even chewed it all to heck.

So, for healed labret and Monroe piercings, I do recommend trying this product if you’re always slamming the metal into your teeth. But it seems kinda clear why we would avoid putting plastics of this nature in what are, in effect, open wounds.

Lissa on March 28th, 2009 at 2:52 pm

I HAVE AN IMPORTANT QUESTION
i am really bad wanting to get my navel pierced for my b-day. ive heard multiple good things about “great” bioplast and ive heard some good things about titanium, but i dont know which would be better for the healing of my piercing…should i get it pierced and use a bioplast or a titanium navel ring for the healing process??? PLZ ANSWER SOON thankyou!

Vannessa on May 20th, 2009 at 3:13 pm

Vannessa: Did you bother reading what I wrote initially?

Bioplast/BioFlex is NOT suitable for fresh piercings, that is not what its intended use is for. Its intended usage is for a HEALED piercing.

Make sure that the jewelry you get for your navel piercing is a Implant Grade Titanium Internally Threaded Navel Bar.

Warren Hiller on May 25th, 2009 at 2:21 pm

Rate This Post

+10 / 14 votes Vote This Post Down

Loading ...

I agree completely with using Bio-Plast for problematic piercings. I got my Monroe pierced about a year ago, first with a typical, metal labret stud. I was having a problem with the metal disc getting caught on my gums when I smiled and when I was doing “other things.” So I ordered an internally threaded Bio-Plast labret stud and I have had no problems since then.
mary k on March 19th, 2008 at 12:16 pm
Interesting story about bioplast…I tried it in my tongue piercing once…bear in mind this was a piercing I’d had for almost 4 years at the time, and I had used various types of metal in it (stainless steel, titanium etc) without any sort of problems. After about a week with the bioplast barbell my piercing was SO irritated. The tissue around the hole was discolored and it was seriously painful. Luckily, just taking it out and putting steel back in brought it back to normal in a couple days. All in all, bioplast gets a BIG thumbs down from me.
jack on March 19th, 2008 at 1:58 pm
If anyone wants to look it up in PubMed, there’s actually a fair number of papers about using polysulfone in implants. I don’t know if these are the same type(s) of polysulfone sold under the TRADE NAME Bioplast, however, because bioplast is apparently also a generic name for a synthetic actin polymer, which is definitely not what you would want to make jewellery out of, so it’s hard to filter through the search results.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?term=polysulfone%20implant
Xenobiologista on March 19th, 2008 at 10:06 pm
I wish I had known this about 3 days ago… I’d heard so much about the wonders of BioPlast, and had it put into a VERY fresh piercing…I had a very bad reaction and don’t have the piercing anymore.
S on March 20th, 2008 at 10:45 pm
Xenobiologista: That’s very true I have found many papers and what not but as always that’s research papers. So as I stated its purely speculation until proper standardized testing is completed in such area’s as ASTM as well as ISO for any implant and/or bio-compatible capabilities.

Most papers discuss bio-compatibility and not implant capability, at least in the searches I’ve found…Although the papers I’ve read discuss that due to the bio-compatibility that research into implant capability should be done,etc…

But as my view is always this, I will continue to champion it…Is the material being put into the piercing implant grade material, or is it not? Implant Grade thus meeting the ASTM standards for medical implant devices/materials,etc.
Warren Hiller on March 22nd, 2008 at 12:47 am
I have had a similar reaction to what Jack describes. I work midnight shift at a casino four days a week and I am required not to have any piercings at all. I decided to try to hide it by using the bioplast lebre. It worked for a couple of days, then it starts itching and hurts really bad. The piercing itself didn’t hurt that bad when I got it. Whe I put the surgical steel back in, it stings for a little bit, but in a few days it goes back to normal. I have tried looking for glass lebre rings since then, but there’s not too many out there. Anybody have a suggestion?
Kaechelle on September 20th, 2008 at 9:41 pm
I struggled with severe hypertrophic scarring on my nostril piercing for almost 2 years before finally buying a bioplast nose screw as a last resort–it was that, or I’d finally have to accept that my nose would never heal. After about 2 months my bump was almost completely down with just a minor dot of scarring, and now, 6 months later, there isn’t a single trace of a scar left. After 2 problematic helix piercings and one of my two nipple piercings needing longer-than-normal healing time, I am very hesitant to get my navel pierced for fear an already very tricky piercing will be devestating. I was considering getting it done with a bioplast piece, but I wanted to look into it first. Because I have a good history with bioplast and a slightly poorer one with stainless, wouldn’t it be better than to skip the likely stainless steel nightmare and go straight for the material that worked best before?
Sekhmet on October 7th, 2008 at 10:54 am
Sekhmet: there would be a lot of questions to factor in on this subject matter.

1) what aftercare protocols you used.
2) What type of stainless steel you had inserted
3) How it was pierced(technique,tools/equipment,etc)

You could always try to research and make sure the jewelry being used is internally threaded ASTM compliant implant grade 316LVM stainless steel or ASTM compliant implant grade titanium.

Or you might even be a person that’s ok to have bioplast…but again there’s no implant grade standards for it so its very much a craps shoot and as a professional I do not feel comfortable suggesting clients use it on a fresh piercing…better to be safe than sorry I say.
Warren Hiller on October 7th, 2008 at 5:42 pm
Ive had my navel pierced for about 2 weeks now, and ive had it done twice before and ive always have had issues with the 316 surgical steel grade jewelry ive had put in it, idk if im having an allergic reaction to it or if my body doesnt like it, anywho i was wondering if it was too soon to switch to a bioplast navel ring, or if i should just not put one in at all..
Raven on December 31st, 2008 at 2:03 am
Raven: Stay away from 316 Surgical Stainless Steel, its crap.

ALWAYS demand/ask for ASTM F-138 316LVM Stainless Steel.

Doctors don’t leave surgical scissors and other surgical tools in the body, so why leave “surgical” jewelry in?

If the jewelry is of proper implant grade specifications and you’re anatomy is suited for a navel piercing AND if it was done by a competent piercer…You should be fine and not require changing any jewelry at all, unless you decide you want a different gem or something like that.

2 weeks IS too soon to change a piercing jewelry, especially to something that doesn’t even have any proper studies on it and is used for products that are not put inside the body…Such as bioplast is.
Warren Hiller on December 31st, 2008 at 12:24 pm
Ok, so I am wanting to get my lip pierced, but am in the midst of hunting for a job. If I get a job that doesn’t allow piercings, I would have to put a clear retainer in. I have had my nose pierced fo about 9 months now and sometimes I put a clear bioplast retainer in it. I haven’t had any problems with it at all. Would it be okay to initially get my lip pierced with a bioplast retainer?
Rave1 on February 9th, 2009 at 5:11 pm
Rave1: You didn’t bother reading what was written did you? That or perhaps you didn’t comprehend what I wrote?

No technically Bioplast is NOT suitable for an initial piercing.

you can either:

A) Put your job before your piercings and simply wait to get pierced until you’re able to wear a steel or titanium piece

or

B) Get your piercer to use a Quartz Retainer initially.
Warren Hiller on February 14th, 2009 at 7:26 am
I got my labret pierced over a year and a half ago . . . even though, as a professional dog handler, I knew it was a stupid move to put a metal stud *rightnext* to my teeth. I love my piercing, and have since the moment I got it; so of course the first time a dog slammed into my face (about two months after the piercing) and chipped a tooth, I was heartbroken thinking I’d have to take the stud out.

Found about about the Bioplast line and figured I’d give it a try. My piercing *was* fully healed (almost immediately, actually), which is probably why I didn’t have issues. Now when dogs slam into my face, the only pain is from the impact.(Something to be grateful for, hunh?) I’m *so* glad that I found these thingies. I’ve had the same stud in the whole time, and have even chewed it all to heck.

So, for healed labret and Monroe piercings, I do recommend trying this product if you’re always slamming the metal into your teeth. But it seems kinda clear why we would avoid putting plastics of this nature in what are, in effect, open wounds.
Lissa on March 28th, 2009 at 2:52 pm
I HAVE AN IMPORTANT QUESTION
i am really bad wanting to get my navel pierced for my b-day. ive heard multiple good things about “great” bioplast and ive heard some good things about titanium, but i dont know which would be better for the healing of my piercing…should i get it pierced and use a bioplast or a titanium navel ring for the healing process??? PLZ ANSWER SOON thankyou!
Vannessa on May 20th, 2009 at 3:13 pm
Vannessa: Did you bother reading what I wrote initially?

Bioplast/BioFlex is NOT suitable for fresh piercings, that is not what its intended use is for. Its intended usage is for a HEALED piercing.

Make sure that the jewelry you get for your navel piercing is a Implant Grade Titanium Internally Threaded Navel Bar.
Warren Hiller on May 25th, 2009 at 2:21 pm

Bioplast

«« Best jewelry for a permanent corset? Shiny new jewelry »»

Wednesday March 19th, 2008 @ 1:30 AM

Filed under: Uncategorized

Rate This Post

15 Responses to “Bioplast”

Leave a Comment

Search

Support BME

Stats

Highest Rated Posts

Categories

Archives

Meta

Feeds