anatomically speaking…
«« Something wrong with my tongue? clamp mark »»
Sunday May 18th, 2008 @ 11:24 PM
Filed under: Uncategorized
i’m interested in getting a triangle piercing, but in all the research i’ve been doing it always says that you must be anatomically suited for the piercing.
what should my vagina look like for it to be anatomically suited for this piercing? i know a piercer could tell me, but i would like an idea going into it.
thanks!
That’s the good thing about contacting AskBME.com, since a lot of us ARE piercers, so when you contact AskBME chances are very high that a piercer or someone with the right information will see it 
Anatomically speaking when it comes to the Vulva, not Vagina, what you are looking for is the Clitoral Hood area of the anatomy. It along with the shape/definition of the clitoris, as well as your outer & inner labia and other potential factors.
If you haven’t checked this out yet I’d say look at the BME Wiki on Triangle Piercings. As you should be able to figure things out that way by that bit of information.
If you have any other specific questions you’d like to ask and delve further into don’t hesitate to ask in the comment section 
Posted by Warren Hiller | Permalink | Leave a comment | Trackback
Rate This Post
4 Responses to “anatomically speaking…”
i actually had looked at the bme wiki already and was still a bit confused… i guess i’m an idiot.
hepcat5009 on May 19th, 2008 at 4:05 amso if the pelvic region is too narrow it won’t work? am i right on that?
Hrm, what’s the best way to describe it? If you have a nice, high, well-defined clitoris-and-hood region and not a whole going on in the way of outer labia or meaty inner thighs that will press that area when your legs are together, you may be an excellent candidate for this piercing.
Lori St.Leone on May 19th, 2008 at 9:05 amyeah Lori you put it a bit more clear then I previously did lol
Warren Hiller on May 19th, 2008 at 9:16 pmthank yous all around..
hepcat5009 on May 20th, 2008 at 5:37 amLeave a Comment