Microdermal Bridge Piercing?
«« Alongement de la langue (french) Unsafe Piercing Parlour »»
Wednesday July 16th, 2008 @ 8:54 AM
Filed under: Pocketing
Hi there!
With the relative solidarity of a surface anchor, I always wanted to know whether or not it would be feasible to have these comprise a bridge piercing rather than the standard surface technique. Would there be a lesser chance of migration or is the skin simply too thin?
Correspondence is appreciated!
Microdermals unite!!!
While this is a potentially interesting use of microdermals, I think the chances of success are pretty small. Most people’s bridges have a bit of curve to them. With a piercing, you can typically find a flat area on that curve where the piercing can be placed. Given the large (compared to say a 14ga barbell) size of the foot of the microdermal, it would hard (if not impossible) to find a flat place for that foot to rest. If the foot isn’t sitting on a flat surface, the jewelry will likely sit funny, resulting in a piercing more likely to migrate/reject…not to mention simply looking funny.
I also think that getting two microdermals to line up so that the piercings looked straight would be harder than getting a standard bridge piercing straight…which can be pretty tricky as it is.
Posted by Derek Lowe | Permalink | Leave a comment | Trackback

Rate This Post
One Response to “Microdermal Bridge Piercing?”
Indeed! Well, it was just a thought. Thanks a lot for your succinct response!
Khymeira on July 16th, 2008 at 8:53 pmLeave a Comment