Shaft Piercings vs Dermal Anchors
«« Subincision Extension / Scrotal Split meatotomy »»
Thursday July 17th, 2008 @ 2:45 PM
Filed under: Male Genital
So I’ve been planning a genital project for quite some time now and while reading through AskBME, I read that shaft piercings can cause erections to be painful.
The planned project was a RPA, 4 trans-urethral apadrayvas, and 4 (possibly trans-urethral) ampallangs.
My question is this: Would it be wise to go with microdermals/dermal anchors where I would want the shaft piercings or should I stick with the old school?
If I did go with the anchors, would I have to be more cautious during sexual activity due to the thinness of the skin along the shaft?
Someone asked a similar question just a few days ago. So I don’t feel I need to point out how BAD of an idea anchors in the penis is. I would like to point out a third option that, to me, is a far better choice than either of the two you mentioned. Genital beading or other genital implants. They should provide what you are looking for with none of the downfalls associated with the methods you mentioned.
Posted by Sean Philips | Permalink | Leave a comment | Trackback
Rate This Post
2 Responses to “Shaft Piercings vs Dermal Anchors”
Thanks Sean. I hadn’t thought about beading. Do you know of an artist in the Upper Midwest that has experience with it?
eca on July 17th, 2008 at 7:53 pmAs someone who currently has 4 shaft apadravyas thru the urethra, one shaft amp thru urethra … and is desperately seeking a piercer to add 3 more trans-urethra shaft ampallangs … I can recommend the shaft piercings with great enthusiasm. I’ve had these piercings almost 5 years, and have upgauged to 2-GA in some cases. I don’t really understand what anchors are, meanwhile someone else has already posted an opinion (no). I’d strongly urge you to get the piercings. There are many side benefits which you will not anticipate at first. Lemme know if any questions?
George on August 22nd, 2008 at 1:14 amLeave a Comment